Bionatura
Bionatura
Latin American Journal of Biotechnology and Life Sciences
Latin American Journal of Biotechnology and Life Sciences
Go to content
2022.07.01.2
Files > Volume 7 > Vol 7 No 1 2022
Previous / Index / Next
The incidence of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase enzymes and their connection to virulence genes in community-acquired urinary tract infection


Halah Farazdaq Rafeeq*1, Zahraa A. Sharba 2
1, Department of Applied Sciences / University of Technology/Iraq
2, Department of Applied Sciences / University of Technology/Iraq
* Corresponding Author: halahfr@gmail.com,
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21931/RB/2022.07.01.2
ABSTRACT

In community-acquired urinary tract infections, Klebsiella pneumoniae is considered as one of the most common etiological agents. In Klebsiella pneumoniae populations, multidrug resistance and virulence are common. In this research, fifty isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae were from urine samples and diagnosed by a vitek 2 compact device. The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion technique was used to perform antibiotic susceptibility tests. That showed about 92% of isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR). The Modified Double Disc Synergy Test revealed that 90% of the isolates produce extended spectrum-lactamases (ESBLs).Genotypic detection of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes was done via PCR assay. The ability of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to produce ESBL genes showed that the SHV gene was the most prevalence among ESBL genes (68%), followed by the CTX-M gene (66%). while none of the isolates possessed the TEM gene. The capacity of isolates to generate Virulence factor type 3 fimbriae (MrKD) genes and biofilm (BssS) genes found that the isolates contain the MrKD gene (82%). The BssS gene was also discovered to be present in (72%) of the isolates. Virulence genes within ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in this study show that only [n=3 (6%)] of isolates which are non-ESBL producing carry one or both virulence genes. While one or both virulence genes are present in [n=41(82%)] of ESBL-producing isolates, the prevalence of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in community patients was found to be high in this research. It's also possible that ESBL production and virulence factors are linked.
 
Keywords. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Antibiotic resistance, virulence gene, ESBL, CTX-M, urinary tract infection.
 
      
 
INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections have serious health and financial consequences for society. These infections considered the most prevalent type of bacterial infection, and they can strike at any moment during a person's life. People in hospitals and the general public are both susceptible to urinary tract infections. CAUTIs (community-associated urinary tract infections) are frequently identified in individuals with risk factors such as age, prior UTI history, sexual activity, and diabetes mellitus. Antibiotics are the most common therapy for bacterial UTIs1. After E.coli, K. pneumoniae is the most medically significant species in the Enterobacteriaceae family2. One of the frequent pathogens linked to both community and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections is K. pneumoniae3. Because bacterial etiology is common in UTIs, broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently used, resulting in a rise of resistant uropathogens1. Antibiotic resistance among K. pneumoniae strains is a major public health concern, as well as a significant financial burden for UTI sufferers. Antibiotic resistance of these isolates is acquired by a variety of processes, including the creation of extended spectrum-lactamases (ESBLs).The formation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, an enzyme that attacks the beta-lactam ring in medicines and renders them useless, causes ESBL resistance4. Several ESBL families have been identified, however the big families such as SHV, TEM, and CTX-M account for the bulk of ESBLs5. The rapidly increasing resistance of ESBL producers to multiple antibiotic families is a major issue that limits the treatment options available against ESBL producers6. In addition, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), capsular polysaccharide, adhesions, and sidrophores are among the virulence components found in K. pneumoniae that contribute to its pathogenicity7. Adhesion is an important phase in the infection that must be strong enough to overcome the host's defensive mechanisms. Fimbriae, also known as pili, are proteinaceous structures that extend from the bacterial cell surface to a distance of 100 nm to several microns and are composed of adhesions that are thought to aid bacterial adhesion8. There are two kinds of fimbriae or pili in K. pneumoniae, types 1 and 39. Type 3 fimbriae have a helix-like structure that gives them spring-like flexibility and stretch-ability. This fimbrial type is encoded by a chromosomally borne gene cluster that has previously been demonstrated to consist of five genes in various strains of K. pneumoniae. The mrkABCDF gene cluster encodes the primary structural component (mrkA) and the fimbrial adhesin (mrkD), whereas the genes mrkB and mrkC encode the chaperone and usher proteins, respectively10.Type 3 fimbriae have been shown to mediate adhesion to various structures in human kidney and lung tissue, as well as epithelial cells from human urine sediments and endothelial and bladder epithelial cell lines, in vitro investigations11. K. pneumoniae biofilm development on biotic and abiotic inert surfaces is commonly linked to Type 3 fimbriae12. Infections caused by K. pneumoniae producing biofilms are more resistant to therapy than other infections. Biofilms serve as shields for bacterial populations, allowing them to evade host defenses.  The bacteria are also protected from severe circumstances such as pH changes, forces of shear, and nutritional deficiencies13. As a result, the current study was designed to look into the distribution of extended spectrum-lactamase enzyme genes (TEM, SHV, CTX-M), virulence genes (type 3 fimbriae MrKD gene, biofilm BssS gene), and the relationship between them in K. pneumoniae isolates from urine samples.
 
 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 
Bacterial Isolation and Identification
 
From different laboratories in Baghdad (50) isolates of K. pneumoniae were collected from (133) bacterial isolates from urine samples from period (2020/07/1) to (2020/09/25). K. pneumoniae isolates were diagnosis by vitek 2compact (bioMérieux/ France) device for their identification.
 
 

Antibiotic Susceptibility test.
 
The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion technique was used to perform Antibiotic susceptibility testing for all of the isolates14. Antibiotics that listed below were utilized: Ampicillin (10 𝜇g), Piperacillin (100 𝜇g), Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (20/10 𝜇g), Ceftazidime/Avibactam (30/20 𝜇g), Cefotaxime (30 𝜇g), Ceftriaxone (30 𝜇g), Ceftazidime (30 𝜇g), Cefuroxime (30 𝜇g), Cefazolin (30 𝜇g), Loracarbef (30 𝜇g), Cepodoxime (10 𝜇g), Cefixime (5 𝜇g), Aztreonam (30 𝜇g), Imipenem (10 𝜇g), Meropenem (10 𝜇g), Gentamicin (10 𝜇g), Tobramycin (10 𝜇g), Amikacin (30 𝜇g), Doxycycline (30 𝜇g), Tetracycline (10 𝜇g), Ciprofloxacin (5 𝜇g), Levofloxacin (5 𝜇g), Nalidixic acid (30 𝜇g),Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 𝜇g), Chloramphenicol (30 𝜇g), Nitrofurantoin (300 𝜇g).
 
 

Detection of Isolates that Produce ESBL. Detect ESBL enzymes production by using Modified Double Disc Synergy Test through the following steps15: After uniformly spread the inoculum onto sterile Mueller–Hinton agar (biolab/Hungary), the disc which contain amoxicillin-Clavulanate (20/10µg) was placed in the center of the plate and the discs of third generation cephalosporin [cefotaxime (30µg), ceftriaxone (30µg), and cefpopdoxime (10µg)] ,and fourth generation cephalosporin [cefepime (30µg)] ,were placed 15mm and 20 mm apart respectively, center to center to that the amoxicillin-Clavulanate disc. After Incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C, any increase in the inhibition zone toward the disc of the amoxicillin-Clavulanate was considered as positive for ESBL production.  
 
 

DNA extraction
 
For the isolation and purification of DNA from K. pneumoniae isolates, DNA was extracted using G-spinTM Total DNA Extraction Kit (Intron biotechnology/ Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration and purity estimated by using Nanovue plus™ spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare/UK).
 
 

Polymerase Chain reaction of Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Genes.
 
The genes coding for virulence factors (type 3 fimbriae MrKD, biofilm BssS) and extended spectrum β-lactamase genes (TEM, SHV, CTX-M) are detected by the PCR method. Primers used in this study were purchased from (Alpha DNA/Canada) in lyophilized form as shown in Table 1. The PCR amplification reaction mixture components (25µl) which are used for the detection of each gene contain: DNA sample, primers, and 5x FIREPol® Master Mix (Solis Bio Dyne/Europe) 16. After preparing the reaction volume in the PCR tube, the mixture was spun down via (Centrifuge/Vortex for PCR plates) and then PCR tubes were placed in the PCR thermal cycler (Bio-Rad/USA) to amplify the target DNA for (TEM, SHV, CTX-M, BssS, MrKD primers) using the following program17 as shown in Table 2.
 


Table 1. Primers used for detection genes.
  

 
Table 2. PCR thermocycler conditions for each gene.
         
 
RESULTS

 
In the current study, 50 K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from urine samples of community acquired urinary tract infection patients. All samples were identified via vitek 2compact device. The antibiotic susceptibility test was done via The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method, then interpreting the results of which was done using criteria published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute18. As seen in Table 3.The results showed that about 92% of K. pneumoniae isolates were multidrug resistance (MDR).
 
 
 
 
Table 3. Antibiotic susceptibility of 50 K. pneumoniae isolates.
 

 
Modified Double Disc Synergy Test (MDDST) was used to detect the ESBL production. The results showed that approximately 90% of the isolates produce ESBLs, as shown in Figure 1.
 
 


Figure 1. Modified Double Disc Synergy Test (MDDST) (A) shows synergism of cefeime, cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime with amoxicillin-Clavulanate, which indicates ESBL production, while in (B) showed no synergism with amoxicillin-Clavulanate, which indicates none of ESBL production.
 
 

The ability of K. pneumoniae isolates to produce ESBLs (TEM, SHV, and CTX-M) genes and the capacity of isolates to generate Virulence factor type 3 fimbriae (MrKD) genes and biofilm (BssS) genes are determined using PCR, which uses sets of primers that amplify the genes. The results showed that SHV gene was the most prevalence among ESBL genes (68%) then the CTX-M gene (66%). while none of the isolates possessed the TEM gene as showed in Figure 2.
 
 

 
 
 
 
Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of (A) TEM gene, (B) SHV gene and (C) CTX-M gene in k. pneumoniae isolates visualized under UV after staining by RedSafeTM nucleic acid staining solution for 1.5% agarose gel at 80 volts for 1 hour. L: ladder DNA (100pb), S: Sample.
 
 
The results found that the isolates contain MrKD gene at (82%) as shown in the figure A (3). It also, found that (72%) of isolates contain the BssS gene as shown in the figure B (3).   
 
 
 


Figure 3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of (A) MrKD gene and (B) BssS gene in k. pneumoniae isolates visualized under U.V. after staining RedSafeTM nucleic acid staining solution for 1.5% agarose gel at 80 volts for 1 hour. L: ladder DNA (100pb), S: Samples.
 

The prevalence Virulence genes within ESBLs and non-ESBLs producing K. pneumoniae isolates were detected as seen in Table 4.
 


Table 4. Distribution Virulence genes within ESBLs and non-ESBLs producing K. pneumoniae isolates.
 
         

 
DISCUSSION
 

In both community and hospital settings, K. pneumoniae is a leading cause of serious infections such as urinary tract infection, pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infection, intra-abdominal infection, bloodstream infection, meningitis, and pyogenic liver abscess. In humans, antimicrobials have long been used to treat K. pneumoniae infections19. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumoniae strains across the world is a major source of worry20. In this study, the results showed that about 92% of K. pneumoniae isolates were multidrug resistance (MDR). MDR is defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories21. These results were close to the results obtained by the research study of Mohamed et al.22Multidrug resistance was revealed in 86.66% of K. pneumoniae isolates. While MDR phenotypes were seen in 75% of K. pneumoniae isolates, according to the study done by23 MDR obstructs disease control by increasing the risk of resistant microorganisms spreading, lowering treatment efficacy and, as a result, causing patients to be infected for longer periods of time24. A variety of virulence factors contribute to K. pneumoniae's pathogenicity25. And the capacity to develop various antibiotic resistances quickly26. K. pneumoniae is, in fact, a significant ESBL host. ESBL development has substantially boosted bacterial resistance to β-lactams in human infections, causing major morbidity and death27. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are enzymes that can give resistance towards β - lactam antibiotics such penicilins, scephalosporins, and aztreonam. This is achieved by hydrolyzing the antibiotics, and beta-lactamase inhibitors like clavulanic acid block these enzymes28.
 
In this research, Modified Double Disc Synergy Test (MDDST) was used to detect ESBL production. As a result, any increase in the inhibition zone (of cefeime, cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime) toward the amoxicillin-Clavulanate disc was interpreted as a sign of ESBl generation. The results showed that approximately 90% of the isolates produced ESBLs. According to one study29, approximately 88.6% of K. pneumoniae isolates produced ESBLs.
 
The ability of K. pneumoniae isolates to produce ESBLs (TEM, SHV, and CTX-M) genes showed that the SHV gene was the most popular among ESBL genes at (68%) than the CTX-M gene at (66%). while none of the isolates possessed the TEM gene. On the other hand, a study done by30 showed that SHV was the most prevalent type of ESBL genes (90.5%) followed by TEM (80.0%) and CTX-M (76.2%). Furthermore, research by23 shows that the TEM gene has the highest prevalence in K. pneumoniae isolates at 64.7%, followed by the CTX-M gene at 41.1% and the SHV gene at 35.2%. According to a study conducted by31 all isolates contained the CTX-M gene, whilst (97%) contained TEM, and (83%) harbored SHV genes. CTX-M was shown to be the most common ESBL in K. pneumoniae community isolates in the majority of investigations32, 33.Antibiotic resistance has developed as a result of widespread over distribution and irresponsible usage. Because most antibiotics are accessible over the counter in underdeveloped nations and may be administered without a prescription, patients and the general public must be educated34. The capacity of K. pneumoniae isolates to generate Virulence factor type 3 fimbriae (MrKD) genes and biofilm (BssS) found that the isolates contain MrKD gene at (82%) while The results found that (72%) of isolates contain the BssS gene.  The prevalence Virulence genes within ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates in this research show that only [n=3 (6%)] of isolates which are non-ESBL producing carry one or both virulence genes. whereas [n=41(82%)] of ESBL-producing isolates contain one or both virulence genes. This is consistent with the study done by35 that suggests a correlation between ESBL production and some virulence factors.
 

CONCLUSIONS

 
In conclusion, the prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae in community patients was found to be high in this research. It's also possible that ESBL production and virulence factors are linked. Antibacterial resistance is a developing problem in clinical practice. As a result, improved clinical awareness and laboratory testing are required to decrease treatment failure and prevent the spread of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae.
 
 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
The writers would like to express their gratitude to everyone who assisted them. The writers are in charge of their own financial assistance.
 

Conflict of interest
 
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.                                                                                                                   
 
 

REFERENCES

 
1. Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infectious Disease Clinics. 2014; 28(1):1-3.
 
2. Lai CC, Lee K, Xiao Y, Ahmad N, Veeraraghavan B, Thamlikitkul V, et al. High burden of antimicrobial drug resistance in Asia. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2014; 2(3):141-147.
 
3. Paczosa MK, Mecsas J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2016; 80(3):629-61.
 
4. Mohsen SM, Hamzah HA, Al-Deen MM, Baharudin R. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum β-lactamase associated genes in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan, Pahang. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2016; 23(2): 14–20.
 
5. Naseer U, Sundsfjord A. The CTX-M conundrum: dissemination of plasmids and Escherichia coli clones. Microbial drug resistance. 2011; 17(1):83-97.
 
6. Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2008; 8(3):159-166.
 
7.  Lery LM, Frangeul L, Tomas A, Passet V, Almeida AS, Bialek-Davenet S, et al. Comparative analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae genomes identifies a phospholipase D family protein as a novel virulence factor. BMC biology. 2014; 12(1):1-15.
 
8. Murphy CN, Clegg S. Klebsiella pneumoniae and type 3 fimbriae: nosocomial infection, regulation and biofilm formation. Future microbiology. 2012; 7(8):991-1002.
 
9. Al-Husseiny KR, Nakkash AF. Study some virulence factors of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical sources. Journal of Thi-Qar University. 2008; 4(3):45-50.
 
10. Stahlhut SG, Chattopadhyay S, Kisiela DI, Hvidtfeldt K, Clegg S, Struve C, et al. Structural and population characterization of MrkD, the adhesive subunit of type 3 fimbriae. Journal of bacteriology. 2013; 195(24):5602-5613.
 
11. Schroll C, Barken KB, Krogfelt KA, Struve C. Role of type 1 and type 3 fimbriae in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation. BMC microbiology. 2010; 10(1):1-10.
 
12. Alwan AH, Abass SM. The effects of UV light on mrkA, mrkD genes in local isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Al-Mustansiriyah Journal of Science. 2017; 27(4).
 
13. Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2019; 8(1):1-10.
 
14.  Vandepitte J, Verhaegen J, Engbaek K, Piot P, Rohner P, Heuck CC. Basic laboratory procedures in clinical bacteriology. World Health Organization Geneva. 2003.
 
15. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2005; 18(4):657-86.
 
16. Sharba MM, Al-janabi AA. SEQUENCE AND STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF HLA-G IN BREAST CANCER PATIENT USING BIOINFORMATICS TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES. Connect journals.2021; 1(21):617-622.
 
17. Abed SA, Al-Khafaji HM. Design Of Primer And Probe To Detect SNP Rs 1892901 In Fosl-1Gene In Different Types Of Cancer In Iraqi Population. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2021; 12(1):296-300.
 
18. Weinstein MP, editor. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.2019.
 
19. Vading M, Nauclér P, Kalin M, Giske CG. Invasive infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae is a disease affecting patients with high comorbidity and associated with high long-term mortality. PloS one. 2018; 13(4):e0195258.
 
20. Struve C, Forestier C, Krogfelt KA. Application of a novel multi-screening signature-tagged mutagenesis assay for identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae genes essential in colonization and infection. Microbiology. 2003; 149(1):167-176.
 
21. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical microbiology and infection. 2012; 18(3):268-281.
 
22. Mohamed SH, Khalil MS, Mohamed MS, Mabrouk MI. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying fimbrial genes in Egypt. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(7):3051-3058.
 
23. Pishtiwan AH, Khadija KM. Prevalence of blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M genes among ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolated from thalassemia patients in Erbil, Iraq. Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases. 2019; 11(1): e2019041.
 
24. Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Broth micro-dilution method for determining the susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Europe PMC. 1995; 82(332):181-185.
 
25. Victor LY, Hansen DS, Ko WC, Sagnimeni A, Klugman KP, Von Gottberg A, et al. Virulence characteristics of Klebsiella and clinical manifestations of K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Emerging infectious diseases. 2007; 13(7): 986-993.
 
26. Kumar V, Sun P, Vamathevan J, Li Y, Ingraham K, Palmer L, et al. Comparative genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains with different antibiotic resistance profiles. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2011; 55(9):4267-4276.
 
27. Atmani SM, Messai Y, Alouache S, Fernández R, Estepa V, Torres C, et al. Virulence characteristics and genetic background of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from wastewater. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2015; 24(1):103-112.
 
28. Ben-Ami R, Rodríguez-Baño J, Arslan H, Pitout JD, Quentin C, Calbo ES, et al. A multinational survey of risk factors for infection with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in nonhospitalized patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009; 49(5):682-690.
 
29. Shakib P, Kalani MT, Ramazanzadeh R, Ahmadi A, Rouhi S. Molecular detection of virulence genes in Klebsiella Pneumoniae clinical isolates from Kurdistan Province, Iran. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2018; 5(8):2581-2589.
 
31. Malekjamshidi MR, Zandi H, Eftekhar F. Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase and Integron Gene Carriage in Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Species Isolated from Outpatients in Yazd, Iran. Iranian journal of medical sciences. 2020; 45(1):23- 31.
 
31. Mbelle NM, Feldman C, Sekyere JO, Maningi NE, Modipane L, Essack SY. Pathogenomics and evolutionary epidemiology of multi-drug resistant clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from Pretoria, South Africa. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1232):1-7.
 
32. Lin WP, Wang JT, Chang SC, Chang FY, Fung CP, Chuang YC, et al. The antimicrobial susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae from community settings in Taiwan, a trend analysis. Scientific reports. 2016; 6(1):1-11.
 
33. Ranjbar R, Memariani H, Sorouri R. Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from children with urinary tract infections. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2017; 5(2):7.
 
34. Holt KE, Wertheim H, Zadoks RN, Baker S, Whitehouse CA, Dance D, et al. Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112(27):3574-3581.
 
35. Gharrah MM, Mostafa El-Mahdy A, Barwa RF. Association between virulence factors and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to nonproducing isolates. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases. 2017:1-14.

Received: 26 June 2021 / Revised: 7 July 2021 / Accepted: 15 July 2022 / Published:15 February 2022
Citation: Rafeeq HF, Sharba ZA. The incidence of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase enzymes and their connection to virulence genes in community-acquired urinary tract infection. Revis Bionatura 2022;7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.21931/RB/2022.07.01.2
Academic Editors: Dr. Layla Fouad Ali, Dr.Hiba M. Al-Khafaji

Back to content