2023.08.04.73
Files > Volume 8 > Vol 8 no 4 2023
Study the difference in a carcass and the relative weight of the Molar, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local duck carcass parts.
Salah Gatea1, Salam Altaie2 , Nihad Nafel3,* , Thamer ALjanabi4 , Sura Khafaji5
1 Department of Animal Production/ Agriculture College/ Kerbala University/ Iraq; Email: [email protected].
2 Department of Animal Production/ Agriculture College/ Kerbala University/ Iraq; Email: [email protected].
3 Department of Animal Production/ Agriculture College/ Kerbala University/ Iraq
4 Department of Animal Production/ Agriculture College/ Kerbala University/ Iraq. Email: [email protected].
5 Department of Animal Production/ Veterinary Medicine College/ AL-Qasim Green University/ Iraq; Email: [email protected].
Available from. http://dx.doi.org/10.21931/RB/2023.08.04.73
ABSTRACT
The existing experiment was intended to explore differences among three breeds of duck, Molar, White Pekin, and Brown Iraqi local duck, in carcass traits and some organs. Thirty ducks (n= 10 of each breed) were reared at age 2 months in an open scheme for 8 weeks. At the end of this period, before and after slaughter, the weight of all ducks had taken. The carcass, thighs, back and neck, wings, and breast were estimated by balance. Then, some slaughter organs, heart, liver, and gizzard were weighed. The statistical analysis of current data showed a significant (P≤0.05) raising in live body weight (LBW) in molar ducks compared with other breed ducks.
On the other hand, the results of carcass traits recorded a significant (P<0.05) increment in wings percentage in molar ducks compared with White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks. Also, the statistical examination verified a significant (P<0.05) increment in heart and gizzard percentages in molar ducks compared to other breeds. The regression equations were also verified for determining live body weight by slaughter traits in three breed ducks. Concluded that there are differences among Molar, Pekin, and Brown Iraqi local ducks in live body weight and carcass weight, as well as weights of some organs; also improved significantly in Molar ducks comparison with White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks.
On the other hand, the results of carcass traits recorded a significant (P<0.05) increment in wings percentage in molar ducks compared with White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks. Also, the statistical examination verified a significant (P<0.05) increment in heart and gizzard percentages in molar ducks compared to other breeds. The regression equations were also verified for determining live body weight by slaughter traits in three breed ducks. Concluded that there are differences among Molar, Pekin, and Brown Iraqi local ducks in live body weight and carcass weight, as well as weights of some organs; also improved significantly in Molar ducks comparison with White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks.
Keywords: Ducks; slaughter; breed.
INTRODUCTION
Domesticated ducks include all kinds and are an essential source of high protein quality in human consumption 1. The Molar duck is a wild bird belonging to the species of domesticated ducks and has become one of the most critical and widespread bird species in the world, especially in Europe. However, its origin remains vague. It is one of the essential duck species, considered an environmentally and economically significant bird for wild bird species, and has a high capacity to grow 2. Duck meat is an important source the broad nutrition of the world’s population because it has a high content of nutrients, compared to chicken meat; if duck meat contains a high percentage of the protein and mineral elements, a small percentage of fat, and a high content of reds muscles fiber in the chest meat 3 and a high content of fatty acids and amino acids available to build body cells 4 . Duck meat with the best production of white bikini ducks in Asia and northern Europe, the least of which is the production of Muscovy duck meat and generators in France and Italy 5. Meat-producing duck strains are, among them, fast-growing breeds to match genetic selection, optimal breeding system, high nutrient attics, high nutritional conversion efficiency, and high growth rate during breeding 6, White Pekin ducks and Muscovy with the highest growth rate between ages 6 and 8 weeks, which is the fastest growth rate and a weight rate of approximately 3.5 kg 7. The current production of duck meats has become a concentrated business in recent decades. The production system is compatible with the development of providing ducks with adequate living and producing good meat quality, as the difference in the duck production system has become dependent on a difference in the type of ground, the density of birds and the drinking system, access to water for swimming or access to the outside and lighting system and its impact on the living of ducks, growth behavior, the weight of carcass and quality of meat 8. However, the high breeding density of ducks reduces growth behavior and bird health.
However, this study is essential, which deals with the study of differences in living body weight, carcass weight, and relative weight of carcass pieces between the types of molar ducks, white Pekin, and local brown duck in which the same attic and environmental conditions were used during the two-month breeding period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty ducks of Molar, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks at age 2 months were reared at Karbala University/ Agriculture collage / Animal Production department from 13/9/2021 to 13/ 11/2022. The ducks were raised in an open system and supplemented with water and diet. The animals were fed identical diets formulated to meet ducks’ maintenance and growth requirements (National Research Council (NRC,1994). The feeding program consisted of a starter diet until 1- 21 days continua (Crude protein 22,07% and metabolizable energy (ME, kcal/kg diet) 2890.45 kcal/kg diet) and a Finisher diet until 22-56 days continua (Crude protein 16,02% and metabolizable energy 2950.75 kcal/kg diet) of age.
After age 2 months, all ducks are weighted, and then all ducks are slaughtered. The weight of thigh, wings, carcass, back and neck, gizzard, breast, liver, and heart was measured, and the percentage weight of wings, breast, carcass, gizzard, thigh, heart, and liver. Also, the equations of the regression were calculated. Statistical analysis of The present data was tested by analyzing variance (SAS, 2001). Significant changes among groups were verified via Duncan’s test at 5%.
After age 2 months, all ducks are weighted, and then all ducks are slaughtered. The weight of thigh, wings, carcass, back and neck, gizzard, breast, liver, and heart was measured, and the percentage weight of wings, breast, carcass, gizzard, thigh, heart, and liver. Also, the equations of the regression were calculated. Statistical analysis of The present data was tested by analyzing variance (SAS, 2001). Significant changes among groups were verified via Duncan’s test at 5%.
RESULTS
Table (1) indicates moral differences (P<0.05) in the rate of living body weight of the molar duck at the age of four months compared to other types of ducks, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local duck, with the live weight rate of molar ducks being 1834.0 g and followed by the live weight rate of bikini ducks 1779.0 g and followed by the local brown duck weight rate of 1494.0 g, respectively. However, we did not find moral the differences in the weight rate of the carcass between the types of ducks, as the rate of weight of the carcass of the molar duck, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local duck 1337.0, 1242.0 and 1138.0 g, respectively, the high live weight rate of the molar duck may be due to having the best behavior in improving the efficiency of dietary conversion and the rate of weight increase compared to White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local duck,
1 Tables -The Data represent means ± standard error.
-The different letters in the similar column indicate significant changes at level ( P≤ 0.05).
- NS: not significant.
Table 1. Comparative study of three strains of ducks in the live body weight (g) and carcass weight (g).
For Table (2), We also note moral differences (P<0.05) in the ratio of carcass to live weight of molar ducks compared to other duck species. At the same time, we did not find moral differences between Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks, as the carcass’s weight rate for molar ducks, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks (72.7, 0.695 and 66.6%), respectively. This is due to the high rate of the living weight of the molar ducks during the breeding period, which led to a higher percentage of carcasses compared to other types of ducks.
2 Tables - Data represent means ± standard error.
- The letters in the similar column indicate the significant changes in a level ( P≤ 0.05).
- NS: not significant.
Table 2. Comparative study of three strains of ducks in carcass (%) and relative weight of carcass parts.
For Table (3), we also note a molar increase (P<0.05) in the relative weights of the eaten pieces (heart, liver and gizzard) of molar ducks compared to other duck species, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks, as there was a moral rise in The relative weight of the heart in the molar ducks compared to other types of ducks in the study, where the relative heart weight of the molar duck White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks (0. 80, 0. 68 and 0. 65% respectively), As for the relative weight of the liver, it increased in the molar ducks compared to other birds, with the relative weight of the liver of the molar duck White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks (2.7, 2.0 and 2.3%), respectively, and for weight. Relative to the gizzard increased in the molar ducks compared to other birds, as the relative weight of the sniper for molar ducks, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks (3.7, 3.0 and 2.7%), respectively, While we did not find moral differences in the relative weights of the eaten pieces between White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks at the end of the study.
3 Tables - Data represent means ± standard error..
- The letters in the similar columns indicate a significant change at level ( P≤ 0.05).
Table 3. Comparative study of three duck strains in the edible viscera’s relative weight (%).
DISCUSSION
The ability of molar ducks to produce a high amount of fat in the body nutrients leads to the development of body mass and a remarkable ability to adapt to environmental conditions and nature, which is a major cause of the significant increase in body weight 9. On the other hand, it was found that the White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local duck is characterized by a low food conversion efficiency, which leads to a decrease in the average live body weight during the breeding period, and this reason shows the superiority of molar ducks in the live weight rate compared to other duck species 10. In another study, he indicated that the percentage of live weight of ducks Pekin rises, and this depends on factors such as sex, genetic factors, and sex-related genes that cause an increase in body weight for ducks and that affect the strain in vivo weight and carcass weight 11. In another study, it was suggested 12 that the absorption rate of nutrients decreases in White Pekin ducks when fed an excessive or excessive diet. This moral improvement of the molar ducks may be due to the ability of the molar ducks to produce a high amount of fat in the body, subcutaneous and wing, which leads to the development of body mass and rapid growth, especially during the period of growth, which is a major cause of the significant increase in body weight 9. However, we did not find moral differences in the measurements studied, including the percentage of breast, wing, back, neck and thighs between the duck’s molar, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks. However, we found a mathematical rise in readings of these qualities studied for molar ducks compared to White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks. This development in the relative weights of the eaten pieces of molar ducks compared to the White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks may be due to the high rate of living body weight of the molar duck, which requires an increase in the weight of these pieces to suit the high body weight to equip it with the nutrients necessary for growth, especially since a molar characterizes the molar duck increased in the weight of the leg muscle and wing, as well as increased in the fat rate in the skin and muscle tissues with age compared to the types of ducks 13. These pieces are also characterized by rapid growth after hatching chicks and during growth because they provide the nutrients necessary to grow and utilize the body’s muscles 14. In addition to muscle tissues, they develop before skeletal tissue and are an influential factor in the development of the skeletal rate 15.
CONCLUSIONS
This research showed differences among Molar, White Pekin, and Brown Iraqi local ducks in the live body weight, carcass weights, and weights of some organs. Also, it improved Molar ducks significantly compared with White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local ducks. In the future, numerous investigations are required to estimate differences in ducks’ reproductive traits among these breeds.
Author Contributions: A short paragraph specifying their contributions must be provided for research articles with several authors. The following statements should be used: “Conceptualization, Salam Altaie; methodology, Salam Altaie. Moreover, Salah Gatea; validation, Thamer ALjanabi; formal analysis, Salam Altaie.; investigation, Nihad Nafel.; resources, Salah Gatea.; data curation, Salam Altaie.; writing—original draft preparation, Salah Gatea.; writing—review and editing, Salah Gatea.; visualization, Sura Khafaji and Nihad Nafel.; supervision, Salam Altaie.; project administration, Thamer ALjanabi.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: “The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (Agriculture College, Kerbala University, Iraq).
Informed Consent Statement: Any research article describing a study involving humans should contain this statement “Not applicable.” for studies not involving humans.
Data Availability Statement: The study did not report any data.
REFERENCES
1. Huang ,Y. H; Burt, D.W ,Chen, H.L .; Zhang, Y. M.;, Qian, W.B. The duck genome and transcriptome provide insight into an avian influenza virus reservoir species . Nature Genetics 2013, 45(7) :776-783.
2. Hirschfeld , A . ; Heyd , A .Mortality of migratory birds caused by hunting in Europe: bag statistics and proposals for the conservation of birds and animal welfare .Berichte zum vogelschutz 2005 ,42:47-74.
3. Al Assadi, M. H.; Majed , S. A. ; Shareef , H. M. Comparative study for some productive performance of Gray and Ducks were raised in Iraq. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture,2019. Proceedings of the 3rd International Agri. Conference, College of Agri. and Forestry, Univ. of Mosul and College of Agri. Engineering Sciences, Univ. of Duhok .2019, 47 (supl. I): 110-118.
4. Woloszyn,J.;Ksiazkiewicz,.J.;SkrabkaaBlonicka,T.;Haraf,G.;Biernat,J.;Kisiel,T. Comparison of amino acid and fatty acid composition of duck breast muscles from five flocks. Archives fur Tierzucht,2007, 9,194-204.
5. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) .2018.FAOSTAT:livestock primary , production quantity, duck meat . Retrieved on 7 july 2020.
6. Adeola,O. Review of research in duck nutrient utilization .Winnipeg , Manitoba,Canada,2006,pp.191-204.
7. Kokoszynski,D.;Arapasova,H.;,Hrncar,C.;ZochowskaKujawska,J.;Kotowicz,M.;Sobczak,M. Carcass characteristics, chemical composition, physicochemical properties, texture, and microstructure of meat from spent Pekin ducks. Poultry Science 2019, 99, 2., 1232-1240.
8. Alaaraji, S.F.T., Awad, M.M., Ismail, M.A. Study the association of asprosin and dickkopf-3 with KIM-1, NTpro-BNP, GDF-15 and CPP among male iraqi with chronic kidney disease (2020) Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11 (5), pp. 10-17.
9. Abael-Hamid, S.E .; Abdelfattah, E.M .Effect of different dietary protein levels on some behavioral patterns and productive performance of Muscovy duck. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2020,8(6): 661-667.
10. Bochno, R.;, Lewczuk, A; Wawko, E. Comparison of growth and feed conversion efficiency of Musk and Pekin ducks. Poultry Science Abstract 1994, 18 CAB International, 20 (3).
11. Khafaji, S.S.; ALjanabi, T.K. ;Altaie, S.M.S. Evaluation the Impact of Different Levels of Propolis on Some Reproductive features in Iraqi Local Roosters. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2019, 7(2):82-87.
12. AL-Qudsi, A., S. Alamili, H. Effect Of Using Sunflower And Canola Oils In Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio L.) Diets On Growth Parameters, Feed Utilization And Body Composition. Anbar Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 2023; 21(1): 95-104. doi: 10.32649/ajas.2023.179719.
13. Bochno, R.;Murawska, D.; Brzostowska, U. Age-Related Changes in the Distribution of Lean Fat with Skin and Bones in Goose Carcasses . Poultry Science 2006, 85( 2) 1987-1991.
14. Murawska ,D. The effect of age on the growth rate of tissues and organs and the percentage content of edible and nonedible carcass components in Pekin ducks . Poultry Science 2012, 91( 8) 2030-2038.
15. Ricklefs,R.E. Adaption, constraint and compromise in avian postnatal development . Biological Reviews 1990,54,269-290.
Received: 26 September 2023 / Accepted: 15 April 2023 / Published:15 December 2023
Citation: Gatea, S.; Altaie ,S.; Nafel,N*.; ALjanabi ,T.; and Khafaji,S. Study the difference in a carcass and the relative weight of the parts of the carcass of Molar, White Pekin and Brown Iraqi local duck. Revis Bionatura 2023;8 (4) 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.21931/RB/2023.08.04.73
Publisher’s Note: Bionatura stays neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Submitted for possible open-access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).